Nigel Fenwick serves CIOs. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make CIOs successful every day.
Follow Nigel on Twitter.
Nigel Fenwick serves CIOs. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make CIOs successful every day.
Follow Nigel on Twitter.
Posted by Nigel Fenwick on August 29, 2012
I love nothing more than a good debate, so when I read George Colony’s recent blog post “Enterprise Architects For Dummies (CEOs)” and then read the comments from infuriated architects I just had to chime in and post a comment. My EA colleagues were the first to enter the fray, with Brian Hopkins posting a reply to many comments on his own post “It Doesn't Matter Where EA Lives - So Let's Stop Arguing About It.”
What’s interesting is that the most comments centered not on whether George was right in highlighting the importance of the EA role, but on whether EA should be seen as an IT role at all. And what is fascinating to me is that some folks believe EA should report to the CEO. The thinking goes that the CIO is too techie, and the EA role is much broader than IT because it involves business process and even org design. This seems to ignore the fact that George actually wrote, “Techies invariably screw up the business; business guys screw up the tech. For years (actually, decades) we've looked for someone to span both -- and that's what Enterprise Architects do.”
This last sentence resonates with me because way back when — let’s just say in the early '80s — I studied for a degree in the UK actually called “Computing In Business” — described as straddling business studies and computer science. The aim: to produce graduates able to bridge the gap between business and technology. I like to think they succeeded — I became a CIO at Reebok in the UK at age 28, in part because I was able to successfully talk the language of business and technology. My role was as a member of the executive board first and technologist second. Fast-forward a few years (well OK, decades then), and the technologies we apply have changed but the leadership principles of successful CIO have not. In much of our research, we talk of the transition from IT to BT (Business Technology). This isn’t simply renaming IT for the sake of it. It is a reflection that more and more CEOs are now expecting their CIOs to be business executives first and technologists second; it is also a reflection that technology underpins every business strategy, and in some cases reveals new business strategies. (See my earlier posts on BT Strategic Planning.)
As technology in our organizations has grown more complex, IT organizations have expanded and in some cases become very focused on the effective optimization of technology. However, CIOs such as Dell’s Andi Karaboutis clearly understand the future of IT is not in the effective management of infrastructure — the future of IT is in enabling the business to achieve competitive advantage. Or to put it another way, the future of IT is BT. And in a BT world, the Enterprise Architecture role is essential to a successful CIO — good architects play a pivotal role in helping to guide business investment decisions, balancing process and technology optimization, business flexibility, risk and complexity against time-to-business-impact (T2BI). Good architects, like good CIOs, understand the language of business and technology.
Attend the complimentary Webinar Provide Next Generation Services To Your Customers June 5, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. EST
Attend the complimentary Webinar Strategies For The Mobile Mind Shift June 5, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. UK time
Attend Forrester’s Forum For CIOs EMEA, June 10-11, London
Comments
Yes, in an ideal world ...
George Colony is right. IT can't be expected to understand the needs of all the other functions in the business. Nor can any of the other functional players reasonably be expected to master the complexity of IT. In an ideal world, EA would be the necessary intermediary. However EA rarely seems to be practised as this model would require -- at least, not in the many enterprises I work with. I'm not sure the expectation is realistic. I'm not sure that EA is the answer to the IT/BT dilemma, which I suspect is really a reflection of the immaturity of IT as a discipline. My usual analogy is Accounting, which has been around for some hundreds of years as a discipline. I wonder if, in the early days, some master craftsman said "you moneybags will never understand about building cathedrals"?
Yes, in an ideal world ...
Thanks for contributing Ian.
What I find interesting is the assumption that "IT can't be expected to understand the needs of all the other functions of the business" but the somehow "EA" possess powers that apparently "IT" lacks and so they can somehow manage this. This completely ignores the fact that the majority of EA are part of the IT team - thereby making this thinking wholly illogical.
Well run IT groups do indeed understand the needs of all the other functions of the business. I'm not suggesting any one individual can successfully do this in a global organization, but IT does do this through the collective expertise of it's members, which include EA professionals.
What is more, there have been "intermediaries" within IT for decades who's role has been to bridge the gap between pure techies and pure business. To suggest that some new group (in this case EA) should take up the mantle of business liaison simply covers over the problem of what is likely to be a dysfunctional IT group.
The problem for such dysfunctional IT teams is that the world is evolving around them and they will not be able to survive much longer. As firms become more able to source technology infrastructure and application development capabilities through cloud services (and outsource contracts), there will be less need for technology expertise within IT and much more need for business technology expertise across the organization. Progressive CIOs understand this and are restructuring accordingly - moving toward BT - and they are building out the EA and business architect expertise in their teams. I predict the CIOs with a focus on technology infrastructure will find a niche, possibly as CTOs or as consultants, but they won't be our future CIOs. As for EA reporting to the CEO ... it will happen (but only when the head of EA becomes the CIO).
nice article
nice article
Test, just a test
louis vuitton borse The former Nike air cushion was formed in a resilient synthetic rubber layer which formed by pouring the air gas into a resilient synthetic rubber under a high pressure. Air-Sole was a "mean" air cushion, which had a balanced performance in the cushioning ability, stability performance and reaction speed performance. And this technology is widely used in a variety of sports shoes even today. Visible Air-Sole: This kind of air cushion was made the Air-Sole into a visible type, such as the heel portion of the AIR JORDAN 3 was used this visible Air-Sole. Visible 180 Air-Sole: A transition between Air-Sole and Max Air, its huge 180-degree visible air cushion loaded with excellent damping force and visual impact. Air Max was launched in 1994, with an initial form of the U-shaped, and then developed into multi-sealed chamber Air Max and the trachea-shaped Tube Max Air. It possessed a multi-interval which was in multiple pressures, with a 5PSI pressure in the low pressure zone and 25PSI pressure in the high pressure zone. Air Max cushioning ability was very strong, can provide appropriateness protection to your feet and your knees, but may cause the loss of machine power. Running shoes and basketball shoes were always adopted this kind of technology. Zoom Air: An air cushion with its thickness of only 4-8mm, fixed with the three-dimensional fabric to maintain its flat shape (otherwise may "from the drum into a ball"), atmospheric pressure 20PSI. The damping effect with an excellent sense of site sensitive rebound effect and excellent acceleration, Zoom Air was widely used in extensive outside basketball shoes (such as FLIGHT series, the AJ series), and speed of running shoes (such as Air zoom Miler). Visible Zoom Air: The external visible Zoom Air was with greater capacity and better cushioning performance. The Tuned Air: An integrated cushioning contained a hemisphere-shaped cushioning system to provide maximum force protection, stable and comfortable foot feeling, and its hemispheric body deformation can provide a changing air pressure. The PBAX thermoplastic material used in the TN Air cushion has the advantages of a fast reflection, rubbing, and lightweight, flexible and suitable feet feeling under the appropriate shoes thickness, with a hemispheric body pressure of 20PSI and a cushion pressure of 5PSI. The total Air: This kind of air cushion can be regarded as the larger version of Max Air palm, with 1.5cm extra length in the fore palm. The most successful Total Air Cushion was the Total Air Foamposite Max-Steel. The mid-sole mechanical cushioning system was composed by the special highly elastic foam materials (advanced PU materials) damping elastic column, and double TPU trays. The SHOX may have different functions when applied in basketball shoes and the running shoes. The SHOX cushion (people who are under 70kg are not obvious) provided excellent cushioning effect and stability, which was widely use in all kinds of sports shoes. IMPAX was the SHOX simplified version, which did not adopt the columnar bottom, and as an alternative, the horizontal punch technology was being used to achieve the effect of damping and stability. IPS was developed specifically by Nike for the new damping technology of Air Jordan XX, by using 20 pieces Phylon material with different density, thickness, size and location, made the relatively independent and organic complexes cylindrical shock absorber. Normal 0 7.8 0 2 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Style Definitions table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:nh
lululemon outlet orlando The rolling gate Manhattan companies are renowned for their quality services and skill. Their services extend to all sorts of rolling gates repairing and problems and other related concerns too. Their products and services are both affordable and reliable that mitigates all gate related dilemmas in absolutely no time at all. The skilled task force of experienced technicians with their round the clock assistance make them names that people have come to trust.
chanel handbags cheap I loved the fact that I could join an affiliate program and immediately start marketing their products. The best affiliate programs are going to give you everything you need to start out.
mulberry alexa handbag is also helpful for the donator because it gives hundred percent tax reduction which can be very helpful during the time of payment of tax.
discount mulberry handbags While you are using the Internet you may also wish to search for a parts installation guide for your motor vehicle. The guide will teach you how to install the accessories or parts you have bought for your car. This is especially important if you are a first time BMW owner.
http://www.mbtshoes89shop.com There are various regions which make different college football game from other football games but still it is more competitive in comparison to other football game and there are four major difference which are not as noticeable are making different college football game to other football games such as clock management, pass reception, knee down and tie breakers, one by one we will talk about each one.
mbt garissa shoes People need to wear glasses for different reasons. Some people are said to be short-sighted or myopic. This is due to the cornea being too steeply curved or the eye longer than normal. Other people are long-sighted or hyperopic because their cornea is too flat or the eye is too short. This means that the light rays focus too far beyond the retina. Others have a condition where the cornea is oval shaped rather than spherical, called astigmatism. To sum up, the laser eye surgery is aim to reshape the cornea to correct these problems.
Post new comment