What The Online Sales Tax Debate Misses

As the election year approaches, we can bet that the cries to impose tax on online retailers will get even more pronounced as politicians look for ways to close our budget deficit and make villains of small but seemingly rich segments that can afford to bear the burden (e.g., private jet owners, Amazon.com). While some journalists are framing companies like Amazon as enabling tax shirkers at the expense of impoverished local school districts, the reality is, the debate is really about big box retailers and physical stores fighting to stop the wallet share war that companies like Amazon are winning online. The NRF has been one of the biggest proponents of making web merchants collect taxes, and it's not surprising that its board is composed of many of the country's largest retailers. Some critical facts:

  • A significant portion of transactions online already collect sales tax because people purchase from online stores like BestBuy.com or Walmart.com, so the real amount that is being “lost” is less than the numbers being bandied around would have you believe, and not enough to make up anyone’s deficit, maybe a small city somewhere but probably not much more.
  • Physical retailers naturally want web retailers to pay sales tax because there is an assumption that no sales tax drives people to shop online. Let's remember, eCommerce is still a small minority of overall transactions (less than 10% in fact) and forcing the collection of sales tax is unlikely to be much of a boon to offline businesses, and is unlikely to even shift much behavior at all. Many customers say that even if sales tax were collected, they would have bought from the same retailer anyway (see figure).  Furthermore, Amazon tends to win on price as well (Wells Fargo issued a great white paper back in February about how Amazon beats even Walmart on price), which further calls into question any behavior shift from the "it depends" segment below.

So why is Amazon fighting this so hard and firing affiliates left and right whenever a state implements an online sales tax law?  Who wouldn't? The status quo works for them and for their customers.  While the data below suggests that a quarter of Amazon's customers may try to find somewhere else to shop if online sales tax were imposed, the real number would likely be far smaller because Amazon still wins on price and generally offers cheap/free shipping.  The bigger issue I suspect for Amazon is that it will have to adjust its pricing algorithms, which will probably bring its margins down a bit.

The reality, though, is that online sales tax won’t stem our trillions in debt and it won’t save the big boxes, which are on a slow and steady slide down. But it will hurt online shoppers, catalog retailers, and small pure plays and entrepreneurs who are trying to create a viable alternative to the big boxes. Amazon is easy to pick on because it has done a horrible job framing the debate. Its position makes it seem like it's saying "We want to keep our unfair advantage," whereas its perspective would probably be more palatable if  it were positioned as facilitating consumers choosing small businesses to patronize. I don’t advocate anyone evading taxes, but let’s call it like it is and realize who are the biggest voices crying foul on this tax issue: the very big boxes and chain retailers that killed small local businesses. They are now whining that they have competition because of a quirk (a legal one, mind you) in our tax system. I never thought I'd live to see the day that Walmart would be positioned as an underdog.

Online sales tax

Comments

"The reality is" I think not

Sucharita - Thanks for highlighting this very important issue. I think you missed a few points I'd like to highlight.

I am a small retailer that sells expensive audio and video equipment. My customers pay 9.3% more if they purchase in state versus out of state. How does penalizing in state retailers and subsidizing large multi-billion dollar out of state companies like Amazon help me? When my customers can spend $9,000 for and item I have to charge them $10,000 and include sales tax - explain how that's good for the local job and economy?

Amazon thumbs their noses at Nexus laws while they enjoy an unfair and huge pricing advantage. In Arizona they have over 3 Million square feet of offices and warehouses. Yet they claim to have no responsibility to collect sales tax (as I do with 7,500 sq feet). How about a level playing field?

You are correct, this is not the silver bullet to cure the national debt issues - but it is both important to correct the situation for all involved and a step towards updating many issues with our present tax system.

-Ed