- RT @kenkousen: Okay, beginning to understand Oracle/Google lawsuit: http://bit.ly/ajiHsa Thanks to Charles Nutter for great post<-EXCELLENT!— 1:37 PM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- @TomGrantForr Was this weekend, but escaped w/out killing too many brain cells. Fortunately no photo of worst parts of @DavidJWest debauch!— 1:25 PM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- Having a lot of fun thinking about "the empowered developer" these days.— 1:09 PM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- RT @samj: Radio, RIAA: mandatory FM radio in cell phones is future http://bit.ly/9SiGKb <-Evidently tech has a silly season, like politics— 12:57 PM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- That grinding sound you hear is the wheels of OSS projects with Oracle involvement coming to a temporary halt. http://bit.ly/9T3Euc— 12:42 PM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- @ggruber66 Not up yet - it's a 30 page doc on how to make decision about mobile dev. Overviews of 14 dev companies too.— 10:38 AM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- Courtesy views of my Mobile dev market overview just went out. Should be up in 48 hours.— 9:58 AM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- WSJ article in print - thanks @mik_kersten, @migueldeicaza— 8:41 AM Aug 16from TweetDeck
- Just downloaded TweetDeck beta. Very nice!— 10:05 PM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- Watching @enaiburg about to try to pull out a win in btm 9th. 5-5.— 9:32 PM Aug 13from Twitter for Android
- I'm at John Ho Sang Field. http://4sq.com/cZJiEQ— 9:12 PM Aug 13from foursquare
- Ooo, just had a flashback to my legal studies 110 class. Amazed I haven't killed those brain cells yet.— 8:00 PM Aug 13from Twitter for Android
- Kill troll with sword (grrr...)— 5:12 PM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- @migueldeicaza , @davejohnson , @mik_kersten - WSJ may be reaching out to you :-)— 1:01 PM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- Any developers in my following that would like to give the WSJ their thoughts on the Oracle Suit? Let me know.— 12:55 PM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- @imcdnzl So how does that license translate to Meego? Could we see Nokia devices w/Meego but others without it?— 10:00 AM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- RT @sogrady: i liked it better when this was the patent approach around Java: http://monk.ly/aATjXY <- Nice find— 9:36 AM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- @johnrrymer I'd still liek to see someone (knowledgeable) analyze the actual patents. On their face they don't look like huge "innovations"— 8:56 AM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- @wjburnett Well, to be fair I guess the founders were pretty radical. Especially Washington, walking away from being a king and all that.— 8:15 AM Aug 13from TweetDeck
- @mjasay Wouldn't prior art be a better approach? These patents don't look that specific to the Java JVM. Class loaders? Security zones?— 8:02 AM Aug 13from TweetDeck