Rob Koplowitz serves CIOs. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make CIOs successful every day.
Follow Rob on Twitter.
Rob Koplowitz serves CIOs. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make CIOs successful every day.
Follow Rob on Twitter.
Posted by Rob Koplowitz on December 1, 2010
For a number of years now, Forrester has used the following definition for Web 2.0:
A set of technologies and applications that enable efficient interaction among people, content and data in support of collectively fostering new businesses, technology offerings, and social structures.
For many Content and Collaboration Professionals (C&C Pros), the first half of this definition looks very familiar. Providing knowledge worker with better access to information and co-workers along with communication tools has been the primary goal since collaboration tools began to seriously penetrate the enterprise 20 years ago.
Now the second half of the definition "in support of collectively fostering new businesses, technology offerings and social structures" is a bit different. This maps to some potentially broad and strategic organizational goals. This is at the core Enterprise Social Media. And Enterprise Social is here. Smart C&C Pros have already begun to take a leadership position in guiding their organization down this path that could be game changer, albeit one that is fraught with challenges.
Here's the challenge: As collaboration moves from being document-centric to more people-centric, the rules change. "Need to know" becomes "need to share". This can be scary, particularly for folks in HR that are concerned with privacy, legal folks that are thinking of intellectual capital, compliance, and the list goes on. Let's not even bring up the word WikiLeaks for heaven's sake. You get the picture.
Now, the real challenge; All that said, for many organizations, it's far worse to hide your head in the sand. The organizations that embrace a new way of working will in fact, foster new businesses, technology offerings and social structures. And if your competitors are doing that, you can ignore it at your own peril. And you know what? If you don't provide the capabilities to your workers, they may well go and provision it for themselves. And that might well be a whole different kind of trouble.
The good news is that a whole bunch of organizations ranging from defense contractors to pharmaceuticals to government agencies and one and on (all highly regulated and with a lot to lose) are well along the way to figuring out the right balance that can drive organizational benefit and still protect organizational data. Key considerations for 2011 include:
Attend Forrester’s Forum For CIOs EMEA, June 10-11, London
Comments
Information sharing in organizations
This is an issue that we find a lot in the energy industry. Only certain individuals within an organization have access to layers of information needed by those making decisions. The easier it is for all relevant employees to see the entire picture of information, the less risky decision-making can be. Open data standards, open-source software, and the ability to find and access quality information make one's business safer - not less so. Great article!