Rick Holland serves Security & Risk Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Security & Risk Professionals successful every day.
Bit9’s Operational Oversight Is Probably Your Operational Reality
Posted by Rick Holland on February 11, 2013
- 160 Recommendations
- 2 comments
You are now no doubt aware that Boston-based security firm Bit9 suffered an alarming compromise, which resulted in attackers gaining access to code-signing certificates that were then used to sign malicious software. See Brian Kreb’s article for more details. (Symantec breathes a quiet sigh of relief to see a different security vendor in the headlines.)

The embarrassing breach comes at a time when the company has been seen as one of the security vendor landscape’s rising stars. Bit9 has actually been around for more than a decade, but the rise of targeted attacks and advanced malware has resulted in significant interest in Bit9’s technology. In late July, Bit9 secured $34.5 million in funding from Sequoia Capital. Bit9’s future was bright.
On Friday afternoon, Bit9 CEO Patrick Morley published a blog providing some initial details on the breach. A few of his comments stood out: “Due to an operational oversight within Bit9, we failed to install our own product on a handful of computers within our network … We simply did not follow the best practices we recommend to our customers by making certain our product was on all physical and virtual machines within Bit9."
Bit9 didn’t provide details on the operational oversight, but it certainly was the result of failed process, failed oversight, or both. A critical configuration management process didn’t exist, or wasn’t executed. An audit function to ensure compliance to security standards wasn’t in place or had not yet occurred.
The discouraging fact is that Bit9’s “operational oversight” is an operational reality for most companies. Ensuring ongoing compliance with security standards requires a significant investment in time and resources. Best practices are best efforts. When compared to most large enterprises, Bit9 is small, with significantly less complex operational challenges. The larger and more distributed the organization, the more challenging compliance becomes. If Bit9 could not avoid operational oversights, can you?
What's this mean for you?
- It isn’t about technology. The latest and greatest technology to combat <insert threat> sure is exciting. Let’s not forget that people, process, and oversight are what make technology implementations successful. If technology overshadows them, then you are doomed to failure.
-
Be pragmatic, you cannot protect everything. 100% compliance with security baselines is pure fantasy. Best practices are best efforts. Even if you have all the updates on your machines, it takes just one zero day in Java/Adobe Reader/Adobe Flash for complete p0wnage. Instead ensure that your most critical assets are hardened and audited. This subset will be much more operationally manageable. Do you know all your critical assets? What are your high-value targets?
-
What is going on in your virtual environment? Bit9’s CEO specifically mentioned virtual machines in his blog posting. I find this to be very interesting and frequently overlooked by enterprises. You must have visibility into your virtual assets and infrastructure. Refer to last year’s CISO’s Guide To Virtualization Security for more information.
-
Network Analysis and Visibility (NAV) is critical. I am not sure how the malicious software was initially detected, but anomalous network activity could have been the source. When our endpoint security controls fail, we have to rely on the network. Having visibility (and not just at the perimeter) remains one of the most needed capabilities within enterprises. Refer to Pull Your Head Out Of The Sand And Put It On A Swivel for more information. Just keep in mind that the next attack could be again your NAV vendor.
Categories:
search forrester's blogs
Secure the digital business future.
Attend Forrester’s Forum for Security & Risk Professionals EMEA, June 10-11, London UK
Analyst Blogs
- Andras Cser (30)
- Andrew Rose (17)
- Chris McClean (54)
- Christopher Sherman (1)
- Edward Ferrara (19)
- Eve Maler (19)
- Heidi Shey (9)
- John Kindervag (28)
- Khalid Kark (13)
- Laura Koetzle (2)
- Nick Hayes (5)
- Rick Holland (20)
- Stephanie Balaouras (50)
Top Categories
- Incident Response (8)
- data security (4)
- cybersecurity (3)
- Forrester's Security Maturity Model (3)
- malware (3)
- NAV (3)
- threat intelligence (3)
- client security (2)
- cyber threat intelligence (2)
- data breach (2)
- See all
Archives
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (3)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- November 2011 (2)
- October 2011 (1)
Comments
Operational Reality
Rick,
You've raised some good points and I'd agree with what I take to be the major conclusion of your piece; be critical of the risks and thorough with your mitigation strategy.
All too often we see clients lack of understanding of the real (rather than hyped) risks cause them to over invest in the wrong places and fail to pay enough attention to the basics.
By far the bigest failing in this case seems to be a failure to realise the value in the code-signing certificate and risks and consequences of any compromise.
Had they done so that cert would have been under lock and key in a HSM
Robert
Bit9 cert hacked
Post new comment