Last week I participated in the 4th annual Smart City Expo – my 4th Smart City Expo. I’ve always enjoyed the event as it is a well-balanced mix of technology vendors, academics across various disciplines and government practitioners – a refreshing change from many tech industry trade shows. In the conference sessions, panels reflect that mix with academics sharing their research on urban studies, vendors promoting their wares, and government leaders discussing their pain points and efforts to address them – oh, and an occasional industry analyst sharing observations on best practices. This year, however, the exhibitors reflected a different mix.
In the first years of the Expo, the exhibition hall featured technology vendors preaching salvation through connected and intelligent city systems – classic “vendor push.” City leaders were eager to see the light but their conversion was not so straightforward. Most city systems were not ready to be connected, and many were far from intelligent. This year cities are ready – or significantly closer. As the CIO of Madrid acknowledged at an IBM-sponsored lunch, two years was the time needed just to transform the thinking of the city council. Now work on their technology platform, called Madrid iNTeligente (MiNT) – which addresses urban mobility, public facilities, road infrastructure, waste, and parks – is well under way. Evidence of that shift was plentiful on the exhibition floor as cities – often sponsored by economic development and investment boards or vendor partners – demonstrated their progress in:Read more