Jennifer Belissent, Ph.D. serves CIOs. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make CIOs successful every day.
Follow Jennifer on Twitter.
Jennifer Belissent, Ph.D. serves CIOs. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make CIOs successful every day.
Follow Jennifer on Twitter.
Posted by Jennifer Belissent, Ph.D. on February 21, 2013
. . . Nor has it ever really been. Government data has long been a part of strategic business analysis. Census data provides insights into local standards of living and household budgets, health needs, education levels, and other factors that influence buying patterns for all kinds of goods and services. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Labour Organization provide data on employment and the availability of skilled labor that helps inform decisions on where to locate manufacturing or other facilities. The World Bank and UN data provides insights into global trends.
Moreover, the release of government data has itself spurred billion-dollar industries. Think weather data released in the 1970s by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – which gave birth to the weather industry and services like Accuweather, weather.com, wunderground, and newer services like ikitesurf.com’s “wind and where.” Data from the US Global Positioning System (GPS) was opened to civilian and commercial use in the 1980s and has given rise to thousands of location-based services. Think FourSquare, Yelp, and Where’s The Bus?
At the city and local government level, open data complements these existing data sources with data on government assets, operations, and performance. And, at the federal level, the mandate to further open public data through the Health Data Initiative and other federal data initiatives in Energy, Education, and other industries expands available data sources.
What can you do with this data? Innovate. And, if you don’t, your competitors will. New competitors will rise up and disrupt the status quo in all industries. There are already some great examples of companies using government data to complement their internal data for strategy decisions, for product innovation, and for new services themselves.
Healthy example of data innovation
The health industry has feverishly adopted the use of data to enhance existing services and provide new ones.
And, data innovation is not limited to startups:
Banking on data innovation
The banking industry has equally invested in the data revolution as cited in a recent Wall Street Journal blog:
Embracing The Open Data Model
Companies are not just using data themselves, they are inviting others in to see and use their data.
Mint Data was a little ahead of its time. But Intuit has now launched a new data program for developers that provides access to:
o Over 65 million accounts and 11 million users supported today.
o Financial data from over 19,000 financial services organizations across the US and Canada.
o Aggregate consumer and business financial account data, plus auto-categorized transactio
ns.
o Secure API for cost-effective, self-serve data access.
o SDKs for .NET and Java to accelerate development of your app.
I’ll stop there with my examples. As you can likely tell, I’m excited about the data opportunity. I’ve been a data geek for a long time: Ask me about running policy simulations all night long on housing data in Russia. And now the data revolution and the new “data economy” are really democratizing the use of data and the benefits that it provides.
New research at Forrester on the data economy will provide tools for evaluating data readiness and for developing a comprehensive data strategy.
We'd love to hear your examples of how you are innovating with data – either yours or someone else's.
Attend the complimentary Webinar Provide Next Generation Services To Your Customers June 5, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. EST
Attend the complimentary Webinar Strategies For The Mobile Mind Shift June 5, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. UK time
Attend Forrester’s Forum For CIOs EMEA, June 10-11, London
Comments
Data Is The Most Strategic Asset Of Insurers
Great post, Jennifer, and you gave some great examples for the health care market.
Insurance companies are also contemplating innovation through the power of data. For the last few years we've seen in Forrester's budget and priorities that anything to do with data and analytics has risen to the top of priorities AND has attracted the biggest investment boosts, year over year. That's because carriers are recognizing that data is a more strategic asset for the business than the investible premium revenue streams.
How are they collecting all this data? Mobile, social and third-parties like the very innovation BuildFax, which sells inspection and permitting software to municipalities across the US and enables insurance underwriters to better assess property values and let insurance adjusters know just how old that roof is. You also have data-driven companies that help insurers know what the claim costs, like Symbility or Enservio which has a 20 billion line item data base about the stuff in people's houses.
But consumer privacy is a huge issue in terms of how insurers are using all that behavioral data collected from mobile devices, sensors, and social. There are two ways that insurers can stem consumer and regulator concern about privacy.
First, insurers can trade discounts for data, and that's presumably the deal made with direct insurers--Progressive's Australia business pretty much spelled it out on their website last summer with a pitch to Australian consumers "willing to share personal information....for a lower price."
Second, and this fits in with your take on government data, some portion of the data that insurers collect becomes a "public good" and insurers contribute some their data to a data commons. This is stuff like claims history that could be parsed by all manner of criteria to identify fraud, such as what the National Insurance Crime Bureau does, or to send a mobile alert consumers when they're approaching particularly unsafe stretches of roadway, such as this amazing augmented reality mobile app that the City of Moscow developed: http://designtaxi.com/news/350327/To-Curb-Traffic-Accidents-a-Macabre-Au....
I understand from one of my insurance clients that the State of New Jersey attempted to create this kind of insurance data commons a few years ago, but it was an idea before the idea of big data got currency.
Thanks for the comment,
Thanks for the comment, Ellen. The consumer privacy issue is certainly a hot spot right now but as we perfect methods of generating aggregated and anonymized data, the fears might be allayed. And, I suspect that there will be a general trend of just "getting used to it" being out there. The data trade option will also likely be more palatable for the milennials who are used to living "online," and thus as the babyboomers move on (so to speak) the trend toward more openness of data will grow.
Thanks for the Moscow example. I was at the Moscow Urban Forum in December. I've mentioned examples from the City in a few blogs and reports. They are doing some great things.
OpenData, data usage transparency and customers values
Hi Jennifer,
Last september I participated to a conference for retailers in France which was opposing "big data" and "opendata" representatives. Daniel Kaplan from FING was doing a very good presentation about becoming transparent for customers and I was presenting "values driven customers" using "activists social computing".
That was a passionating debate bringing new perspectives and deontologies that companies should apply if they do not want to be put out off the game by activists... For example anonymisation contrary to what you think will not be automatic in many companies with bad behaviours. There will be "mad" marketters the same way there was "mad" traders...
Hi Henry, Thanks for the
Hi Henry,
Thanks for the comment.
But we haven't stopped trading because there are those that break the law. We need to make sure that the laws and governance frameworks are consistent with the behaviors we want to encourage (if not ensure).
Naysayers help us focus efforts on doing it right, rather than not doing it at all.
Jennifer
No we have not stopped but regulations are increasing..
No we have not stopped trading and we will not stop marketing. My point is we should change the governance to become agile governance to at the same time delegate some of the decisions to operational marketers but also survey and control the results on customers. We should not wait from regulations which will come after disasters and damaged brand images.
Post new comment