The Forrester Blog For Infrastructure & Operations Professionals

« Oracle Supports Virtualization On X86 Systems With Its Own Xen-Based Hypervisor | Main | Virtualization + Open Source = A Revolution in Networking »

November 14, 2007

HP And IBM’s Blade Rivalry A Boon For IT Consolidation

James HP and IBM are tossing barbs at each other in the blade server space this week with dueling management tools that greatly simplify administration, whichever platform you choose. On Monday, HP announced the latest iteration of its Virtual Connect technology and today, IBM finally unveiled its competitive offering, Open Fabric Manager (although IBM’s won’t start shipping until Dec. 21). Both tools let administrators pre-assign network and storage configuration settings that fail-over and migrate with the server and virtual server images running on those blades. They both also, in these latest iterations, let you manage these profiles across multiple blade chassis (up to 100 chassis).


While one can certainly quibble over which vendor’s solution is better, IBM argues more flexibility, supporting a wider variety of Ethernet and FC switch blades. HP claims Virtual Connect is more mature, feature-rich, and capable. There’s no denying this type of competition is good for enterprise buyers. Blades are more power and space efficient, provide greater configuration flexibility, and now are far simpler to manage than volumes of traditional rack-mount servers.


For IT consolidation purposes, blade chassis are arguably the best consolidation platform available today. Their benefits over racks of traditional x86 servers are obvious. But their fit is now extending past that of even UNIX scale-up systems. Large UNIX SMP servers have historically leveraged hardware partitioning as their means of slicing up a large server. Blades are essentially the equivalent of this capability. Yet there’s more configuration flexibility in today’s blade chassis, as you can mix any ratio of storage and compute, intermix FC, iSCSI, 1GbE, 10GbE, and InfiniBand, and even mix processor families. And there’s no migrating of software from one platform to another — a big win. Add in server virtualization software and these new network connectivity management tools, and you have a very compelling solution for consolidation.


While everything about each vendor’s blade chassis are proprietary, that shouldn’t prevent you from leveraging these solutions to meet consolidation needs. The blade market is a new and important battleground for server vendors and their latest innovations are highly likely to show up here first.


By James Staten


Check out James' research.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c50bf53ef00e54f954fcc8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference HP And IBM’s Blade Rivalry A Boon For IT Consolidation:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Search this blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



You should follow these analysts on Twittersmall

Stephanie Balaouras

Elizabeth Herrell

Evelyn Hubbert

Natalie Lambert

Glenn O'Donnell

Galen Schreck

Chris Silva

James Staten

Chris Voce

Doug Washburn

Simon Yates

The rest of the I&O team
on Twittersmall

Rachel Dines

Christian Kane