Sprint, Back In The WiMax Saddle?
I’ve been following the voluminous press around Sprint’s WiMax partnership
announcement today. I’ve been following the news mostly to see if I’m
missing anything, and it seems I’m not. It looks like a good news/bad news story
for end users of the service. The good news is that there is a solid consortium
around Sprint’s Xohm initiative which, until now, seemed increasingly more
promise than substance. With the most recent dissolution of the agreement with
Clearwire and subsequent deployment delays, I was beginning to think we’d see
LTE before WiMax coverage that Sprint had promised. In short, it looks like a
solid team – albeit with some fluffy marketing language. Intel’s roadmap was
already committed to supplying WiMax chipsets in its devices as a way to drive
up sticker price with a small increase in BOM cost, regardless of the network
build out.
The bad news: this does nothing to get Sprint closer to reaching it’s committed 100M PoPs with the Xohm service by year’s end as stated in mid-2007. No doubt this will raise questions on the longevity of Sprint as a whole and some doubts around how soon any of us will see Xohm service in North America. It’s also been suggested that the backhaul Sprint has in place (mostly T1) is underpowered for the throughput the Xohm service will need to backhaul once it’s up and running with a decent number of users. Microwave backhaul is an answer to this, but not something that Sprint seems to have invested heavily in.
So, for now it reads to me like a lot of good intentions which do nothing to diminish the daunting task of building out the network and it’s requisite backplane to make Xohm a reality at the level of expectations Sprint and others have built around WiMax. New company or not, what matters now is execution, and the clock is ticking before WiMax begins to lose spotlight to true 4G technologies like LTE.
By Chris Silva
Check out Chris’ research

Everyone wants to make their data centers more efficient and
gain recognition for their efforts but we’re lacking the benchmarks to shoot
for. Well, here’s your chance to help change that. On March 20th the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) kicked off a data collection process to help create Energy
Star™ ratings for data centers. Energy Star, the best known energy efficiency
identifier, is respected as a mark of credibility for products and services
that deliver superior energy efficiency. While mainly a consumer mark, the EPA
recently published a
In recent years, AMD has struggled to remain relevant in the commercial PC as it has competed against Intel, the market share leader and gold-standard in processor performance. Today, companies often only choose AMD for its lower initial acquisition costs — which run approximately $50 to $75 cheaper than Intel’s, although you’re sacrificing performance to get there. This approach of narrowly undercutting Intel has not worked well for AMD, as it has now seen
On April 18th, IBM announced its intent to acquire virtual tape library (VTL) and deduplication vendor Diligent Technologies. For IBM, Diligent is a good fit. The company offers both mainframe and open systems virtual tape libraries and they are a pioneer of deduplication. However, IBM already offers a market leading mainframe VTL based on its own intellectual property and an open systems VTL based on FalconStor technology — although the open systems VTL has very limited adoption — so there is also a lot of overlap. Because Diligent is a software solution, IBM can quickly integrate Diligent with any of its storage systems and bring new VTLs to market relatively quickly. It’s very likely that IBM will in fact pursue this route so it can bring an inline deduplicating VTL to market as quickly as possible.
Bucking the ‘hardware is a commodity’ trend seen widely in the storage industry these days, emerging vendor Xiotech recently announced their Emprise line of storage arrays based on a modular component called Intelligent Storage Element (ISE), housing drives in sealed DataPacs designed to dampen vibration, prolong lifespan, and reduce the incidence of “no fault errors.”
On April 10, 2008,
News emerged Friday regarding EMC’s acquisition of data protection reporting software maker 
I met with