Henry Peyret serves Enterprise Architecture Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Enterprise Architecture Professionals successful every day.
Metadata Investments Are Difficult To Justify To The Business
Posted by Henry Peyret on July 6, 2010
- 275 Recommendations
- 3 comments
Rob Karel and I (thanks to Rob) recently published the second document in a series on metadata, Best Practices: Establish Your Metadata Plan, after a document about metadata strategy. This document:
- Broadens the definition of metadata beyond “data on data” to include business rules, process models, application parameters, application rights, and policies.
- Provides guidance to help evangelize to the business the importance of metadata, not by talking about metadata but by pointing out the value it provides against risks.
- Recommends demonstrating to IT the transversality of metadata to IT internal siloed systems.
- Advocates extending data governance to include metadata. The main impact of data governance should be to build the life cycle for metadata, but data governance evangelists reserve little concern for metadata at this point.
I will co-author the next document on metadata with Gene Leganza; this document will develop the next practice metadata architecture based partially but not only on a metadata exchange infrastructure. For a lot of people, metadata architecture is a Holy Grail. The upcoming document will demonstrate that metadata architecture will become an important step to ease the trend called “industrialization of IT,” sometimes also called “ERP for IT” or “Lean IT.”
In preparation for this upcoming document, please share with us your own experiences in bringing more attention to metadata.
search forrester's blogs
Build for the digital business future.
Attend Forrester’s Forum for Enterprise Architecture Professionals EMEA, June 10-11, London UK
Lead with a "mobile first" strategy.
Attend the complimentary Webinar Provide Next Generation Services To Your Customers June 5, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. EST
Analyst Blogs
- Alan Weintraub (4)
- Alex Cullen (38)
- Brian Hopkins (28)
- Charlie Dai (4)
- Clay Richardson (39)
- Craig Le Clair (38)
- Derek Miers (19)
- Ellen Carney (1)
- Gene Leganza (21)
- Gordon Barnett (2)
- Henry Peyret (9)
- James Staten (2)
- Leslie Owens (10)
- Michele Goetz (18)
- Sharyn Leaver (2)
- Tim DeGennaro (6)
Top Categories
- Data governance (2)
- BCEA (1)
- big data (1)
- business architecture (1)
- business services (1)
- business-centered enterprise architecture (1)
- capability maps (1)
- Data management (1)
- EA Assessment (1)
- EA Framework (1)
- See all
Archives
- May 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (1)
Comments
Enterprise
This is a really creative post, Nowadays, consumers know what they want and what they need so it’s in our best interest to give it to them in the simplest form possible.
Thanks and Regards/-
Jason Webb
Start with Basic BI Building Blocks
We've been working on "ERP for IT" for several years (thanks, Ralph, for getting us started on this). It took a while to start getting it right, but once we went back to the basics of BI, it started to fall into place for IT ERP. We identified the measures, dimension, etc. as well as the data sources (CMDB, asset management DB, application portfolio DB, Bill of IT/capability map DB, etc.) and built out a system using our convential BI toolset with cubes, reports/dashboards, etc.
BI building blocks for buidling "ERP forIT" is one angle
Thank you Doug for taking part of this discussion with an interesting angle. What you described using BI for IT is something Forrester talked about with Integrated IT Management (IIM). There are probably still some documents in our research.
But there are several angles by which an IT organization will attack that problem of industrialization of IT. Please find below a first list of my thinking but be free to complete it :
- through process optimization : ITIL, PPM or others
- through capability maps of IT
- through packaged apps adoption for IT like SAP for IT
- through automating interfaces between different existing packaged applications servicing IT
- through metadata exchange
If you have any experience in one or several of these approaches please feel free to share the results with us. Doug was your initiative useful to drive better optimisation in IT?