Posted by Henry Harteveldt on July 31, 2009
I am a fan of Travel Weekly, a truly comprehensive travel industry publication. I've been reading Travel Weekly for the million or so years I've been in the travel industry and am sincerely impressed with how its editor, Arnie Weissman, continues to take the publication in new and exciting directions.
The July 30 issue of TravelWeekly.com has an article by Jeri Clausing regarding hotel industry performance for the first-half of 2009 from Smith Travel Research (STR), a leading hotel industry research firm. STR's data clarifies the enormous financial impact the recession is taking on hotels::
- The average hotel occupancy rate declined 10.9% compared to the first half of 2008, to 54.6%
- The average daily rate (ADR) paid by a guest fell 8.7% from the first-half of 2008, to $98.66
- On average, hotels' revenue per available room (revPAR), a key profitability metric, declined 18.7% compared to the first-half of 2008. Bobby Bowers, senior vice president of operations at STR, describes the decline as "by far the largest first-half decline ever recorded by Smith Travel Research."
There's more, but it's pretty bleak. I don't want to lose you, so for all the gory details, read the Travel Weekly article and the STR announcement.
Anyway, this got me thinking (always risky): How could eBusiness have helped? True, nothing could have protected hotels from the massive economic mess we're all in. I do, however, believe that hotels made their own challenges worse. How? As an industry, hotels failed to use eBusiness as effectively as they could have -- and should have.
- Show me a hotel Web site that lets you shop based by a price point (e.g., ($100/night), price range ($100-$149/night), or total budget ($200 for 2 nights). If you don't think this is important, you're wrong -- terribly wrong. Our North American Technographics(R) Travel Online Study, Q1 2009, shows that 46% of US online leisure travelers say they allow their budgets to dictate where they go on a trip. If you call any major hotel' chains toll-free number, a property directly, or a travel agency, they could help you with any of these three requests. eBusiness channels and experiences must emulate, and ideally beat, their offline counterparts.
- Hotels don't do a good job of creating any emotional engagement. Not every trip can be a getaway to a glorious exotic destination for a relaxing vacation -- but just because a guest is going to a not-so-thrilling destination doesn't mean your Web site's planning and booking process has to be not-so-thrilling as well.
- Few hotel Web sites provide the necessary context required to help travelers make well-informed decisions. Many lack useful content as well. I worked in luxury hotel marketing. To this day, I can't tell you which is better, a superior room or a deluxe room. Sadly, most hotel Web sites can't help you, either (some of the online agencies, like Expedia, actually do a better job of this). Pan Pacific Hotels does an excellent job with how it presents room information within an availability search. Unfortunately, most major chains' Web sites, including Accor, IHG, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, and Starwood, do not. Room descriptions lack critical details that allow a guest to make a well-informed decision, like room dimensions, details about the furnishings, and relevant, good-quality visual content.
- Poor post-purchase and on-property electronic communications. Yes, reservation confirmation emails arrive almost instantly. And, giving credit where due, many chains' confirmation emails (including Hilton, Hyatt, and Marriott) include links to both complimentary and fee-based hotel services. Too often, though, that's the only electronic communication the guest sees. Hotel execs tell us they often can't send any other email to guests if the reservation is made within a week of arrival, because properties lack the ability to operationally respond. As for guest communications during the stay, well, as they say in Brooklyn, fuhggedaboutit. Few, if any, major hotels take advantage of email or mobile communications to reach guests -- and their wallets -- while they're on property. Lots of great revenue-generating opportunities are missed as a result.
So how could eBusiness have helped hotels? Here are just a few:
- Web sites with useful tools, like budget-based shopping
- Better content and written descriptions
- Creating timelines from time-of-booking to check-out, and determining the most effective digital channels and marketing or promotional messages that would work to coax much-needed revenue from guests' tightly-guarded wallets.
Against the loss of business from key segments like meetings/conventions and corporate travel, nothing could have totally insulated the industry from all the turmoil. But by failing to push themselves to do more with eBusiness, to invest when times were better, to re-think property operations against the increasingly "wired" guest that hotels serve, hotels may have allowed their financial troubles to be worse than they should have been.
If you're a hotel executive, or if you work for a company that supports hotels through technology, please weigh in. I'd enjoy hearing from you.
Thanks for your time.