Henry Dewing serves Infrastructure & Operations Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Infrastructure & Operations Professionals successful every day.
Follow Henry on Twitter.
Henry Dewing serves Infrastructure & Operations Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Infrastructure & Operations Professionals successful every day.
Follow Henry on Twitter.
Posted by Henry Dewing on July 16, 2010
NTT is set to buy Dimension Data (DiData) for US$3.2 billion. For decades, customers have lamented their traditional telco service providers’ lack of IT integration depth — today, NTT appears to be putting its money where its customers want. Following in the footsteps of more focused deals like BT’s acquisition of Wire One or AT&T’s acquisition of VeriSign’s Global Security Consulting Business, the acquisition of Dimension Data signals NTT’s intent to be a superpower in worldwide information and communications technology (ICT) solutions delivery. But, make no mistake, it is still only a small acquisition for NTT — as one of only three telcos in the world with more than US$100 billion in revenues, the US$3.2 billion acquisition price will have only incremental effect on the firm’s balance sheet.
Other than the right to say NTT owns a highly respected global ICT integrator, what’s in the deal for NTT?
Much was made of the complementary business lines and geographies in the press release. While that may mean that the businesses can continue to operate independently with ease, I believe NTT will have its work cut out for it to deliver extra-normal returns from the acquisition — and change the face of the ICT market moving forward. How can it do that? I see a few strategies that will help:
When the deal closes in the fourth quarter, I hope to see the combined company deliver the full set of managed services (from networks to applications and from on-site to in the cloud) across the ICT market landscape leveraging the unique capabilities and geographic coverage that this global juggernaut has to offer.
How do you think the integration will be executed? And what do you think is the highest priority for the combined company when the deal is closed? Please join the conversation and leave a comment.
Thank you
Attend Forrester’s Forum for Infrastructure & Operations Professionals EMEA, June 10-11, London UK
Attend the complimentary Webinar Provide Next Generation Services To Your Customers June 5, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. EST
Comments
Difficult balance
The one concern the existing DiData customers must have about this acquisition is whether NTT will keep DiData autonomous and allow them to carry on as business as usual or try to integrate.
Integrate and the cultural differences could cause significant issues for a traditionally South African run company. The Japanese have a very specific way of doing business and I don't believe there are many overtly successful Sino-Western M&As that the industry can point to.
Conversely, with NTT like all telco's wanting to improve their ICT standing, it would be prudent not to have an integration program that would bridge the gap in teaching Dimension Data sales organisation to sell full managed services with integrated carriage services.
All in all this looks like a difficult acquisition to execute.
cultural balance
The cultural difficulties of merger are indeed potentially significant. NTT has said that DiData will be able to run autonomously but that IS easier said than done! If both companies combine to offer services jointly only when it is obviously advantageous and appropriate (like a right of first refusal) they will have little advantage or disadvantage - gaining only scale. On the other extreme, If the organizations only work with each other, they will have more opportunity to generate some savings from synergies but may be unable to bid on many other opportunities potentially sacrificing scale for margin. The optimal path lies in the middle, seeking the intersection of customer needs, network capacities and services capabilities. In areas where there are few capabilities or capacities available, a network of partners will be required in order to truly grow the scope and scale necessary to continue to increase their business with global multinationals.