Clay Richardson serves Enterprise Architecture Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Enterprise Architecture Professionals successful every day.
Follow Clay on Twitter.
Clay Richardson serves Enterprise Architecture Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Enterprise Architecture Professionals successful every day.
Follow Clay on Twitter.
Posted by Clay Richardson on March 11, 2013
As some of you know, I’m a bit of a political junkie. I believe I picked up the political bug from years of riding shotgun with my dad as he listened to Rush Limbaugh blaring on the car radio. As a kid, I loved listening to Rush and trying to understand where he was coming from, trying to understand his perspective, trying to understand his ideology. The term “culture wars” in U.S. politics is used to define a clash between two different political ideologies – conservatism and liberalism.
Over the past few years, I’ve also started using the term “culture wars” to describe the clash and fragmentation we’ve seen in the BPM market. In the BPM space, the clash has primarily been around dynamic case management (DCM), human-centric workflow, and straight-through processing ideologies.
I’m the first to admit that fragmentation and categorization is not always a bad thing, since it can help software buyers and decision-makers better understand which solutions best match their business requirements and desired business outcomes. However, the fragmentation in BPM sometimes overlooks the primary purpose and value proposition of BPM – to help support creating a sustainable business change program.
Whether you’re looking to enter into BPM from a DCM perspective, a human workflow perspective, a smart process perspective, or a straight-through processing perspective is really only one piece of the puzzle. The other big piece of the puzzle focuses on building out sustainable practices that continue to deliver real business value and transformational benefits over an extended period of time.
Over the past six months, my colleague Derek Miers and I immersed ourselves in evaluating the landscape for BPM suites. A key part of this research focused on how well BPM suites supported building out a sustainable business change program, as opposed to just delivering individual process projects from siloed perspectives. Through our research, we found that the next generation of BPM suites focus on helping change programs:
So in a very real sense, these three trends are forcing BPM suites to move beyond individual ideological views of business process. Instead of taking pot shots at each other, savvy vendors are focusing on supporting change programs that can deal with internal and external disruption. In short, BPM suites have matured since our 2010 market evaluation and are positioned to have a greater impact across the enterprise, for both business and IT.
Attend Forrester’s Forum for Enterprise Architecture Professionals EMEA, June 10-11, London UK
Attend the complimentary Webinar Provide Next Generation Services To Your Customers June 1, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. EST
Comments
Convergence or Integrated Suites
Hi Clay,
Good post! Glad to see you covering this shift.
I don't think customers ever cared one iota about the "BPM Wars". The leading vendors were shouting to cover for BPM tools that could not and would not address all work patterns, and on the other side folks with alternate solutions were screaming to get heard over the BPM marketing machine - tempest in a teapot.
You are right to focus on diversity of work patterns. As I think you know, I've been talking about work as a continuum of structured and unstructured, human and system activities for a long time, its good to see these ideas being embraced.
I think it's good to ask "how" vendors will bring these together - through acquisition and forcing disparate solutions in an "integrated box", or by changing the application model to line up with a more loosely-coupled and dynamic 21st Century. We've taken the latter path, and the rewards for customers is that they can have a process that has properties of all work patterns - the continuum, which seems to fit their needs well.
Best Regards,
Dave
Post new comment