At the end of 2012, Forrester and the ITAM Review, an IT asset management community site, ran a software asset management (SAM) survey to help understand where SAM is going in 2013. The resulting infographic* and commentary is available to Forrester clients here. For non- (hopefully future-) clients I’ve extracted some content to create this blog.
The focus and drivers for SAM have changed
Since the early 2000s, risk-focused IT professionals have voiced their concern over software compliance and the potential for vendor audits, large financial fines, damage to corporate reputation, and even the imprisonment of company directors. But these concerns weren't necessarily shared by the rest of the organization, which also viewed the SAM technology available as too difficult and complex to justify. As a result, SAM was a low priority on the IT management to-do list.
But this is starting to change as IT organizations realize that their software estates and procurement and provisioning processes are in a state of under-management, if not mismanagement. As a result, these organizations are wasting a significant amount of their IT funding each year on license procurement when they don't need to, maintenance agreement costs for more licenses than they actually use, and supporting and hosting software that should have been decommissioned.
It’s not really a blog but it’s definitely post worth writing (OK, cut and pasting).
I missed CA World this year, as CA Technologies held a specific IT analyst event a few months earlier that I sadly couldn’t attend. And when I say “missed” I mean more than just “didn’t attend”; I really did miss the event that is CA World, particularly the people – both CA Technologies employees and their customers.
All is not lost, however, as not only were presentations available via the Web, CA Technologies has made a significant number of the IT service management (ITSM) and IT asset management (ITAM) presentations available post event: