Boris Evelson serves Application Development & Delivery Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Application Development & Delivery Professionals successful every day.
Follow Boris on Twitter.
Boris Evelson serves Application Development & Delivery Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Application Development & Delivery Professionals successful every day.
Follow Boris on Twitter.
Posted by Boris Evelson on December 12, 2012
It’s that time of year again, when everyone starts asking for the BI predictions for next year. Good news: We did a pretty good job on the last year’s predictions, and so there’re only a few reasons to update them. Therefore this year we’ll do the predictions in the following manner: base 2013’s predictions mostly on our one-year-old 2012 ones and then use the latest results from Forrester’s Forrsights surveys on BI and big data (as well as other Forrester research from the past year) to confirm or disprove the 2012 predictions and whether they still apply to 2013. If there’s room to add new ones (stay tuned), we’ll do so. So here we go:
#1 (From 2012 prediction #1). The best tool for each BI job trumps IT standards. BI has traditionally been ruled by overinsistence on enterprisewide standards and a single version of the truth. These will continue to be important, but they won’t be the Holy Grail. A purely standards-based approach to addressing most current business requirements is neither flexible nor agile enough to react and adapt to ever-changing information requirements. In 2012 (and now in 2013), expect IT to start embracing agile BI tools, such as ones based on flexible in-memory models, in addition to enterprise-grade BI tools and standards. For information workers who need information anytime and anywhere, agility concerns will trump standards.
From 2012 prediction #2. A “multiple BI tool” strategy is here to stay for the foreseeable future. Multiple BI tools have been spreading like wildfire, especially in large enterprises, over the past 10 years. But rather than fighting that trend, organizations now realize that consolidation and centralization are no panacea. Currently, Forrester client inquiries about how to live with multiple BI tools far exceed inquiries about platform consolidation. Why? There is simply no one vendor that provides all of the key agile BI capabilities. And this is unlikely to happen in the near future, so the need for multiple BI tools will be a pragmatic reality well into 2012 (and now into 2013).
#2 (From 2012 prediction #3). Ready or not, information workers will demand more BI control. The current BI approach — a never-ending stream of business requests that IT cannot keep up with — has become unsustainable. Information workers get frustrated with the time lag between when they make requests and when IT fulfills those requests, so they demand more control over BI. End user self-service features of BI tools, such as semantic layers and search capabilities, will become increasingly critical when selecting and deploying BI tools and solutions.
#3 (From 2012 prediction #4). BI tools that support the right amount of managed end user self-service will become popular. Self-service BI allows casual and power BI users to fulfill the majority of their own requirements, such as ad hoc queries and exploration of entity relationships, without IT hindering business processes. But it’s not that simple. It’s like the story of Goldilocks and the three bears: No management or control is unacceptable, but too much control will also become less and less popular. Organizations need to find just the right amount of control that balances the needs of end users and IT. The winning solution will combine the flexibility and agility that self-service brings with behind-the-scenes monitoring and adjustments that improve performance.
#4 (From 2012 prediction # 5). Mobility is no longer a “nice to have” — it will become the new BI mantra. Currently, mobile BI adoption is behind the curve compared with other enterprise mobile applications. This is mainly due to the perceived lack of specific business use cases and tangible ROI. But mobile BI caught up in 2012, will continue to progress in 2013, and will eventually become the norm. Why? Information workers can no longer wait to make decisions until they “get back to the office” — that may be too late. Forrester expects that, as BI goes mobile, certain robust mobile features will become the norm: multiple visual query methods, leverage of GPS signals for geolocation and geospatial analytics, animated displays, sensor-based queries, and integration with other enterprise mobile ERP applications.
#5 (From 2012 prediction #6). Cloud BI will slowly and steadily chip away at on-premises implementations. Cloud BI solutions remain immature, and heavy integration and customization of enterprise BI platforms, tools, and applications will not go away anytime soon. But the story of cloud BI isn’t all bad news. Interest in cloud BI solutions certainly exists, due in part to the need to lessen the burden on internal IT resources and the desire for elasticity and low initial investment cost. This won’t happen overnight, but in the coming years Forrester expects the cloud BI market to continue expanding as leading BI vendors get in the game, blurring the lines between on-premises and cloud deployments.
#6 (From 2012 prediction #7). BI-specific DBMSes will gain popularity. Alternative database management system (DBMS) engines architected specifically for agile BI will emerge as one of the key fundamental agile BI technologies that BI pros should closely evaluate and consider. These specialized, BI-specific DBMS databases — those that are designed specifically for BI reporting and analysis — currently have lower adoption rates when compared with their bigger, older, more versatile, jack-of-all-trades RDBMS cousins. But don’t expect these low adoption rates to continue; BI-specific DBMSes started to become mainstream in 2012 and the trend will continue in 2013. Forrester expects that more than 20% of all BI applications will be based on this technology within the next two years.
#7 (From 2012 prediction # 8). Big data will move out of silos and into enterprise IT. The amount of data available is growing faster than enterprises’ ability to deal with it. But big data approaches — techniques and technologies that make handling data at extreme scales affordable — can transform this data into insights. Big data will disrupt the data management landscape by changing fundamental notions about data governance and IT delivery, where a single version of the truth ceases to be absolute and becomes relative and contextual. While big data remains for many an unrealized ideal, IT started taking big data initiatives more seriously in 2012 and will continue to do so in 2013. Why? Business is going to demand that data be better harnessed in more cost-effective ways, as traditional BI is often costly and without a clearly tangible ROI. As the idea catches on, big data will start to move out of silos and into enterprise IT, which will need to learn how to manage it.
#8 (From 2012 prediction #9). Data exploration will become the new bread and butter of BI suites. Schema-driven BI applications based on a relational data model lockdown severely limit what can be analyzed and reported. Organizations must create these applications specifically for the business questions at hand in order to navigate the data effectively. This isn’t sustainable, as one can never foresee every single question that will ever be asked of a model-driven BI application and prebuild that logic into data models. Information workers will demand the ability to explore data without preconceived notions, specific questions, or fixed, prebuilt data models in mind. Put simply, the business demands the flexibility to explore data on its own terms — so expect solutions that support exploration and freeform information discovery to become the new bread and butter of BI suites.
From 2012 prediction #10: BI will integrate with the information workplace (IW). IWs bring together multiple technologies in a seamless, contextual user experience that allows your information workers easy access to the information they need. IWs will drive the next generation of worker efficiency, and business process pros need to consider BI within this context. Many BI vendors claim that self-service functionality is virtually guaranteed by virtue of tight integration with desktop-based office tools like spreadsheet, presentation, and word processing software. But that’s not nearly enough. BI users will start demanding, and vendors will start delivering, BI tools integrated with all parts of the IW — such as email, search, portals, collaboration platforms, and social communities — rather than just Excel.
And now . . . drumroll, please . . . two brand-new predictions for 2013:
#9 An enterprise “tax” on top-down BI initiatives will become more popular. Let’s consider two popular approaches to building BI environments and applications, and offer an alternative, hybrid approach:
#10 Hadoop-based BI applications will start encroaching on mission-critical territory. Given the current state of Hadoop software (immature at best functionality that we have come to expect from any DBMS environment, like transactional controls, multiphase commits, and rollbacks of incomplete transactions), most Hadoop-based BI implementations are not being used for mission-critical applications. We are, however, beginning to see a few glimpses that this may change in the near future. We see a few companies that are willing to invest in custom coding that addresses current Hadoop limitations in order to achieve long-term cost savings from eliminating commercial software license and support costs and eliminating the reliance on proprietary hardware. We currently know of only a handful of such cases but expect to see more in 2013. Please drop me a note if you know of a Hadoop-based BI application that falls under this mission-critical category.
Comments
Prediction #4—Mobile BI Is a Necessity Moving Forward
Mobile BI is an absolute necessity moving forward, especially in the pharmaceutical industry. At IMS, we see a tremendous untapped potential to apply mobile technologies to a variety of commercial applications – including using it to help sales representatives better engage with prescribers. Having instant access to product performance and the drivers of this performance, prescribing patterns, patient demographics and more, helps reps to better prepare for sales calls, as well as have more informed and meaningful conversations with prescribers about their patient base and treatment options.
Moving away from a spreadsheet culture to one where users have ready access to information that’s relevant, easily accessible and tuned to their unique requirements will drive user adoption and have a significant impact on sales force effectiveness. But mobile BI does not mean ‘iPad’ only. Pharma needs to think of mobility as a trinity—it’s a laptop, a tablet and a smartphone. We’ve seen several companies think of mobile as only a tablet and then build their plan around this, only to have to realize that they need to rethink – and reintroduce – their entire mobile approach at significant cost and time. BI needs to incorporate the needs of each user role, in this instance the sales rep, and have the appropriate design and delivery mechanisms in place. Decisions around online/offline access, user-driven queries that enable on-the-spot customization, and privacy/regulatory needs are just a few of the essential inputs when determining a mobile BI strategy. Mobile BI is definitely something that requires careful consideration, and when companies do it right, they’ll see tremendous benefit in terms of a better informed field force and stronger relationships with physicians.
I especially like...
Nice article. I especially like
> multiple BI tools far exceed inquiries about platform consolidation
This is so true. An example is Edge.BI, http://www.seperia.com/technology/ - now supported by Israel’s Office of the Chief Scientist (http://www.matimop.org.il/ocs.html) who also sees these BI trends.
Keep up the interesting articles.
on #9, while I agree with
on #9, while I agree with what you have said, by definition it appears that your description of each approach is backwards. A Top Down approach is how you would approach an enterprise data warehouse (Inmon's model) whereas a bottom up approach is your business unit or business use case specific data mart (Kimball's approach).
In any regard, I agree that a hybrid approach is the way to go in order to support a more agile BI environment.
Good One
A Good summary
Nice to see an analysis that
Nice to see an analysis that has involved real thought and understanding, instead of just recycling soundbites from elsewhere.
(No subject)
(No subject)
I predict BI will become understandable in 2013 ...
And cease to be the magical blue box. Also, on a side note, if someone mentions BI = > governance, then I'm going to throw up.
Not agree with multiple bi
Not agree with multiple bi tools strategy. This seems not cost effective as bi tools are becomming offered in packages. Choosing one vendor is compromise but very cost effective
Jb
multiple BI tools - Strategy
The comment multiple BI tool does not necessary mean multiple vendors. It may be from same vendor and should not exceed a limit of 3. 1-Standard Reporting and Analysis 2-Data Discovery and Dashboard and 3-Simple to use: Self Service. A combination of all the 3 from a single vendor is an ideal situation, but a combo can be made from 2 vendors as needed for business needs. But the thumb rule - Single Data Source and 1 version of data
Re Prediction #9 - BI Tax
I think an organization would get more traction if they added a "Data Management Tax" to all of the system development or ERP projects. The taxes collected can be used to the help fund the data modelling and integration portion of the EDW/BI program. After all, if the CIOs are allowing all of these projects to happen without integrating and sharing data across the enterprise, then in effect they are sanctioning the creation of independent data stovepipes. Stovepipes that will never be integrated - without the Data Management Tax.
Post new comment