Boris Evelson serves Application Development & Delivery Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Application Development & Delivery Professionals successful every day.
Follow Boris on Twitter.
Boris Evelson serves Application Development & Delivery Professionals. See the full Analyst bio.
Visit Forrester.com to learn how we make Application Development & Delivery Professionals successful every day.
Follow Boris on Twitter.
Posted by Boris Evelson on July 7, 2010
Whoever said BI market is commoditizing, consolidating and getting very mature? Nothing can be farther from the truth. On the buy side, Forrester still sees tons of less-than-successful BI environments, applications and implementations as demonstrated by Forrester's recent BI Maturity survey. On the vendor/sell side, Forrester also sees a flurry of activity from the startups, small vendors and large, leading BI vendors constantly leapfrogging each other with every major and minor release.
In terms of the amount of BI activity that Forrester sees from our clients (from inquiries, advisories and consulting) there’s no question that SAP BusinessObjects and IBM Cognos continue to dominate client interest. Over the past couple of years Microsoft has typically taken the third place, SAS fourth place and Oracle the distant fifth. But ever since Siebel and Hyperion acquisitions, the landscape has been changing, and we now often see Oracle jumping into third place, sometimes leapfrogging even Microsoft in the levels of monthly interest from Forrester clients.
Siebel and Hyperion acquisitions were tough for Oracle. Acquired tools brought completely new and largely overlapping BI technology to Oracle. Not only did Oracle have to make strategic product choices between its own legacy BI products (Oracle Discoverer and Reporter, PeopleSoft EPM, etc.) and the newly acquired products, it also had make tough strategy calls whether Hyperion or Siebel products will be front and center of the new Oracle OBIEE (Oracle BI Enterprise Edition) Suite.
Well, the decisions are over. From all of the 10.x product releases, it is now clear that OBIEE, mostly based on Siebel products (BI Server, BI Publisher and Oracle Answers) is Oracle’s strategic BI platform, with Essbase as a MOLAP add-on that can serve as either a source to OBIEE BI Server or an individual BI workspace on top of BI Server as a data source. All other Hyperion and PeopleSoft BI products are now in lifetime support mode only.
After concentrating on reconciling and integrating BI products for the past couple of years, OBIEE 11g, launched officially today, takes it up a notch. And a significant notch that is. Just like a Romulan captain in the Star Trek: The Next Generation series who said in one of the episodes, “After a long absence, we are now back,”, OBIEE 11g has features that make all enterprises running Oracle applications think twice before looking somewhere else for their enterprise BI platform.
Having said that, there’s nothing in the OBIEE architecture that requires tight coupling with Oracle applications and middleware (unless you want it to). Common Enterprise Information Model (CEIM, a semantic middleware layer similar to SAP BusinessObjects Universe or IBM Cognos Framework Manager) can link to, source and model data from pretty much all common data sources. Not only does CEIM tie it all together, it can tie it in a ROLAP (Relational OLAP) engine — BI Server (based on Siebel nQuire product). ROLAP — architecture under two leading BI products, OBIEE and MicroStrategy — enjoys a clear advantage over MOLAP, or cubes, since it can “drill anywhere” in your data sources, not just “anywhere in the MOLAP cube”. As a result, ROLAP-based products do not require creation of as many data marts or cubes as products using other OLAP architecture, and therefore often enjoy lower long-term total cost of ownership.
OBIEE 11g release new features fit largely into one of two categories:
Gap closing functionality includes:
But OBIEE 11g also adds the following completely new and quite differentiating features, which do set OBIEE apart from all other leading BI platforms:
One of the most significant announcements planned for the future releases (unfortunately, not part of the first 11g release) is Oracle’s in-memory analytics. It’s a hot trend for multiple reasons and Oracle intends to take full advantage of it. While the specific plans are somewhat murky, it’s clear that Oracle plans to take the best from its existing tools (TimesTen in-memory RDBMS, columnar store and compression from Exadata, OLAP functionality from BI Server and Essbase, and aggregation engine from Hyperroll) and create an in-memory OLAP engine, which potentially will compete with IBM Cognos TM1, SAP BusinessObjects Accelerator Appliance, QlikView, TIBCO Spotfire and Microsoft PowerPivot.
11g is a huge new release, bringing tons of important new features to the OBIEE platform. Therefore, I am not personally too concerned with a few features that I wish were in the release but are not, such as:
Having said all that, Oracle BI is definitely back!
Attend the complimentary Webinar Provide Next Generation Services To Your Customers June 1, 2013, 1:00–2:00 p.m. EST
Comments
BI market maturing
Boris,
I can certainly understand the defensive position relating to commoditization in certain aspects of BI -- almost infinite potential exists for algorithms within the realm of differentiation and predictive, for example.
However, I wouldn't necessarily include consolidation in the same set of claims. While market power and commoditization often follow relational trajectories, it's not uncommon in my experience to see a divergence like we have seen in the digital workplace environment. That is to say that we have a serious disconnect in enterprise software generally between market need as stated by customers and adoption. That usually equates to false barriers to entry (by false I mean real barriers, but due to factors other than product or innovation).
I see the broader enterprise software market as a classic oligopoly -- particularly after the latest round of acquisitions, which was obviously a reaction to unsustainable costs in the core legacies. Of course global scale efficiency and reducing redundancies particularly in sales and maintenance offers a great deal of cost savings, and acquisitions are the primary method for innovation across many industries now, but consolidation has undeniably occurred in a rather grand fashion, certainly to include BI.
I do agree that a niche will very likely always exist due to the need for differentiation and distaste for bureaucracies by some portion of the best and brightest, but I do have concerns about the health of the market. If I were a current CIO in a large organization, I would be very proactive as a market farmer -- particularly sustainable innovation.
Mark Montgomery
Founder
Kyield
Mark, thanks for the
Mark, thanks for the comments. I think we are in agreement here. I also predict more consolidations in the near future. 1) Leading vendors like Oracle, Microsoft, IBM and SAP have not completely filled out their BI stacks, 2) We are very likely to see a new round of consolidations from new BI megavendors like EMC (as proven the other day by Greenplum acquisition) and HP, and 3) I am also counting on BI consolidations in the open source space from RedHat, Novell, etc. So plenty of materials to fuel that fire for a long time.
Mobile platforms
Hi,
thanks for the post and this usefull info.
Where did u find info about that : "Mobile BI apps delivered to iPhone/iPad, BlackBerry, Android and Windows Mobile devices" ?
I couldn't find anything else than Iphone app info on the subject.
thanks.
My understanding is that
My understanding is that today, iPhone is supported via the Business Indicators application (separately sold) on 10.x versions of OBIEE. The OBIEE mobile roadmap is iPhone, iPad, Blabckberry, Android, and WinMo, respectively. iPhone and iPad will be in the first point release, followed by Blackberry.
Oracle #1?
I see Oracle getting to #1 spot if it can speed up its release of products/features (But if it does at the pace as it did with OBIEE 11g release, Oracle is doomed to fail)... However IBM, SAP and Microsoft has a long way to go, if they need to catch-up with Oracle's current BI offering. With Oracle's unique position of owning servers, storage, database, applications and a good aquisition strategy, I see that they will continue to dominate BI space this decade.
IBM lacks apps, but strong consulting services - they can sell anything that they want to...(It is a bliss for IBM at the cost of Executives ignorance)
SAP lacks hardware and a good DB(ofcourse, Sybase Aquistion is very late in the game)..ultimately a good potential target for buy-out...
Microsoft lacks everything but Excel :-) and to a certain degree a credit to their sqlserver, analysis services and their reporting services with some integration point to sharepoint
SAS, they do need get out of data mining branding and get into mainstream BI (Vs speacilized BI)...again a good potential aquisition target...
Oracle - eveyrthing positive, unless they screw up themselves.....But I see that they are very behind on Webcenter piece, which is a very critical component of BI (in today's E 2.0's world)...
Chandra Kapireddy
PS: I'm not an Oracle Employee.