- Forrester Councils
- Councils Overview
- log in
Posted by Boris Evelson on May 23, 2007
by Boris Evelson.
I’d like to hear what my colleagues out there think about the convergence of structured and unstructured data business intelligence. Here are the intersects as I see them. I see two types of BI paradigms emerging in the future:
I also see emergence of search DBMS as a superior architecture for Decision Support (DS) over relational databases. Traditional relational databases have been designed from ground up for structured data and therefore play a constant balancing act of trying to fit a square peg into a round hole – fitting unstructured data such as XML, rich media and other “blobs” (Binary Large Objects) into relational structures. As a result, relational databases are pushing their limits of capabilities to store and process unstructured data. Storage and processing themselves are less of an issue here, but rather it is the inherent inflexibility and rigidity of relational schemas that do not lend themselves naturally to unstructured data processing. One typically needs to know the kinds of questions that will be asked and what types of analysis will be run in the future in order to model data for structured BI. But unstructured data BI is unpredictable by nature, there’s no room there for predefined schemas. Index DBMS, such as ones from FAST Search and Endeca, are nothing but indexes with data imbedded in them. They require no schemas, are infinitely more flexible, and can handle structured data just as naturally as unstructured.
Lead BT Transformation
Develop customer-obsessed strategies to drive growth »
Forrester's CX Index
Predict how actions to improve CX will affect revenue performance.
Measure the customer experiences that matter most »