Help Shape Our 2010 Marketing Budgets Research!

The Marketing Leadership team at Forrester has just launched our most recent global executive panel survey on 2010 Marketing Budgets. The goal of the survey is to understand how Marketing Leaders like you:

Read more

People will still pay for (access to) content

Just came off the stage at PaidContent 2010, a day-long summit here at The Times Center near Times Square, dedicated to the question of if/how/when people will pay for content. The timing is good -- as I wrote in January, The New York Times is planning to charge for content within a year or so, Hulu is considering a subscription model (not necessarily in place of but, I believe, in addition to its free service), and the eBook pricing dilemmas are causing sleepless nights.

I opened the conference with a brief assertion that fretting over whether people will pay for content is based on a mistaken assumption: that people have ever paid for content in the past. They actually haven't. Instead, people have paid for access to content. But in an analog world, access was gated by physical form factors like vinyl, newsprint, and movie theaters. As a result, the coincidence of form factor and content made us believe that people pay for content.

But people have never paid for content. Even when a daily newspaper was a necessity for the average home, the dime you paid a day (in the 70s) for a newspaper did not cover the print cost, much less the reporting. Instead, it was classified ads and auto dealers who footed most of the bill. And the hours we spent on TV and radio every day through the last half of the last century until the explosion of cable in the 90s, were all free. When cable finally asserted itself, people did not pay per show or even by channel (with the exception of premium movie channels). Instead, they paid for overall access.

Read more

Advertisers Are Increasingly Disenchanted With TV Advertising

On the heels of ad-centric Super Bowl Sunday, we just completed a report based on our survey of 104 national advertisers in a joint study with the ANA, fielded in December 2009 and January 2010. The results illustrate marketers’ continued lack of confidence in the effectiveness of television ads.

Read more

Aussie ecommerce practitioners: let's hear from you

Almost everyone I meet in Australia's online sector has an opinion about where we are as a nation when it comes to ecommerce, and where the situation needs to improve.

Well, this is your chance to share your experiences.

Let us know what practices you've embraced in Australia, which you've so far avoided, and why. 

The Australian Online Retailing Study awaits your input.

National, regional and global marketing: tell your story

We’re seeing high growth in much of Asia and the developing world, and low or negative growth in many parts of the industrial world.

We’re seeing rapid evolution in consumer tastes, and massive, leap-frogging investments in broadband infrastructure in a number of markets.

Consumers increasingly travel, migrate and sustain global interpersonal relationships.

More than ever before, they consume media and products from other markets.

Read more

My Innovation Conundrum

One of the 'hot topics' CMOs tell us they want to spend more time and thought on is innovaitons.  Rightly so, given that it is a sweet spot for top executives - 93% cite innovation as a top priority.

Read more

In Amazon vs. Macmillan, Amazon comes off conqueror

It was a surprising weekend for those of us who had naively imagined that after crossing the River iPad, we might actually get some Elysian rest. But, alas, the fates conspired against us and handed us the curious case of Amazon vs. Macmillan. Or Macmillan vs. Amazon?

For those who actually took the weekend off, let me summarize what happened. John Sargeant, the CEO of Macmillan Books, gave Amazon a wee-bit of an ultimatum: switch from a wholesale sell-through model, where Amazon buys digital books at a fixed wholesale rate and then can choose to sell those books at whatever price it deems appropriate (even at a loss, as it does with $9.99 bestsellers), to an agency model, where Amazon agrees to sell at a price set by the publisher in exchange for a 30% agency fee. Sargeant explained to Amazon that if it did not agree to the switch, Macmillan Books would make its eBooks subject to significant "windowing" wherein new books are held back from the digital store for some period, say six months, while hardback books are sold in stores and possibly, digital copies are sold through the iPad at $14.99.

This is more detail than we usually know about a negotiation like this because of what happened next. Sargeant got off of a plane on Friday only to discover that Amazon had responded by pulling all Macmillan books from the Kindle store as well as from He then decided to make it clear to the industry (and his authors) that this drastic action was Amazon's fault, in a paid advertisement in a special Sunday edition of Publishers Lunch.

Read more