Umm, That'd Be "Women," Not "Girls"
Somebody explain to me how David Carr at the New York Times can write about women's sites under the headline "Slumber Parties Go Digital"?
« Probably Science Fiction? | Main | The New Agency Network »
June 02, 2008
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c50bf53ef0105362dd476970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Umm, That'd Be "Women," Not "Girls":
The comments to this entry are closed.
ML Bloggers
Search this blog
Recent Posts
- Rethinking Brand Management in the Digital Age
- Five Strategies for Fighting the Recession
- Consumers' Favorite Online Brands
- The Future of Agencies: What Do You Think?
- Millennial Teens Are More Brand-Loyal Than You Think
- If NBC Joins Comcast...
- What Marketing Leaders Can Expect At Forrester’s Marketing Forum in London
- Pssst! Government can be, well, innovative
- Ready, Fire, Adapt!
- 5 Ways For Marketing Leaders to Toe-Dip Into Social Media
Comments