- Forrester Councils
- Councils Overview
- log in
Site serves CIOs. .
Posted by Site Administrator on February 23, 2008
Microsoft's passing around a memo from platforms & services chief Kevin Johnson to its employees about its proposed merger with Yahoo. In it, it reiterates what it perceives as the benefits of the merger, with a particular focus on the goodness for the industry:
We did a quick survey of about 50 Jupiter clients -- a fairly even mix of publishers, marketers, and service providers -- and they pretty much agree. There's a modest positive tilt to the responses, with a few caveats.
- 50% thought it would make buying and optimizing search marketing easier, while only a quarter thought it would make it harder.
- The split was closer, but still positive, on remnant inventory (39% to 25%) and on premium display (33% to 21%).
- Less than a third of the respondents were concerned that a merger would result in decreased traffic quality for any of the three ad types. Jupiter search analyst Evan Andrews points out this either means they're seeing the glass half full, or that they haven't yet thought through the implications of merging the two search buckets, which taken individually to-date have not delivered the quality or ROI that Google advertisers (and publishers) have enjoyed.
- And there was concern that prices would go up in premium display (50% were concerned), remnant display (42%), and search (54%).
I'm not convinced that -- outside of a few content categories like personal finance, portal home pages, and, maybe, auto -- a merger of Microsoft and Yahoo properties would create a large enough concentration to tilt competitive pricing its way. Still, there's no question there would be increased concentration overall.
Jupiter estimates that the $20 billion 2007 US online ad business broke down like this:
Google - 31% (up impressively from 25% in 2006)
Yahoo - 14% (down a bit)
and Microsoft and AOL flattish at 8% apiece. MSN actually outgrew the other two portals, but couldn't keep up with Google. (These figures are what the companies keep, that is "ex-TAC" or minus the money they pay out to their network partners. That's another several billion dollars passing through their machinery.)
And finally, because we do this for a living, I have to gripe about numbers. Microsoft's Johnson throws out a figure of $80 billion for online advertising in 2010. Even if that's worldwide, and even if he's counting mobile, that number's too big, and smells of Wall Street calculators. We don't forecast markets outside the US and Western Europe yet, but the markets we do project will generate about $48 billion in 2010 online (if I'm converting euros properly) and another few billion dollars in mobile. There's no way Asia-Pacific and Latin America will amount to $30 billion that fast.
Jupiter podcast first take on the potential merger
US online advertising forecast
W. Europe online ad forecast
US mobile marketing forecast
W. Europe mobile advertising forecast
Or check out Quantify for a quick way to digest the numbers.
Save Money On Your Next Software Negotiation
Work with our software negotiation experts to save 10–20% on your next contract »
Lead BT Transformation
Develop customer-obsessed strategies to drive growth »
Forrester's CX Index
Predict how actions to improve CX will affect revenue performance.
Measure the customer experiences that matter most »